i Dalam bukunya Ampy kali (Diskursus Seksualitas Michel Foucault, , 15) dituiskan “ saat enempuh pendidikan di ENS, kecerdasan Foucault cukup. Michel Foucault is a major source for the idea in critical accounting and . Pemikiran Foucault setelah arkeologi pengetahuan adalah genealogi yang ditan – dai. Arkeologi pengetahuan /. Main Author: Foucault, Michel, Other Authors: Zoerni,. Published: Yogyakarta: Penerbit Qalam, Subjects.
|Published (Last):||15 May 2015|
|PDF File Size:||10.68 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Refresh and try again.
I am no doubt not the only one who writes in order to have no face. Inyiak Ridwal Muzir translator.
David Dalakishvili rated it liked it Jan 29, If you are patient, then proceed with a read. Discourse arkeoligi the name of the game, so you’ll read a lot about what he calls “discursive formations. He spends a laborious amount of time constructing the exact definition of discourse that he is going to be discussing, as well as taking into consideration almost every counter-argument that zrkeologi be used against him, that I felt I was reading an elaborate note tree instead of a piece of theory.
Are you already preparing the way out that will enable you in your next book to spring up somewhere else and declare as you’re now doing: Pablo rated it liked it Oct 19, Views Read Edit History.
That being said, this work pengetahuam how our categories and unities in various disciplines are social constructs and not self-evident realties. Foucault’s project was particularly influenced by Nietzsche, his “genealogy of knowledge” being a direct allusion to Nietzsche’s “genealogy of morality”.
Intellectual history breaks down. It’s not difficult to read, exactly, but when he finally gets to his argument about the ways language is structured through complicated discursive practices pengrtahuan arrangement and power I was grateful in a, “I’ve gotten to the fireworks factory,” sort of way.
At least spare us their morality when we arkeolog. His writings on power, knowledge, and discourse have been widely influential in academic circles.
Mudah dimengerti, Foucaul Di antara sumbangan berharga Michel Foucault pada konstelasi keilmuan dan filsafat kontemporer ialah buku The Archaeology of Knowledge ini. Read The Order of Things instead. Dan, bagaimana postulasi kegilaan berkorelasi dengan temuan arkeologis suatu peradaban?
In a late interview he definitively stated: Thanks for telling us about the problem. Knowledge that formulates itself and in that formulation shapes itself and its object of study. Links within the wiki are in green.
In the s Foucault was associated with structuralism, a movement from which he distanced himself. October 15, Poitiers, France. I decided it’s the combination of two factors: Navigation menu Personal tools Create account Log in.
Bila selama ini kita mengenal istilah arkeologi sebagai disiplin ilmu yang bertalian dengan kerja-kerja observatif-lapangan, misal penggalian temuan candi, Foucault, lah, yang mentransfernya ke ranah filsafat.
Foucault also rejected the poststructuralist and postmodernist labels later attributed to him, preferring to classify his thought as a critical history of modernity rooted in Immanuel Kant. The content is available under fair use. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. The Care of the Self ; abandons hope of completing the fourth volume, to have been entitled The Confessions of the Flesh; hospitalized on 3 June, Foucault dies twenty-two days later, not of cancer–persistent rumors and media reports which misled Charles Ruas among others aside–but of a septicemia characteristic of AIDS.
I love the last line, and in a way it’s a summary of the entire work, so I’ll share it: To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Recommended, but more because it’s hard to avoid than because it’s a joy.
Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Interesting, but it raised a lot of questions. Language referring to a concept changes over time.
For Foucault there might be some solid footing for his own understanding, but what good is that to any of us? To ask other readers questions about Arkeologi Pengetahuanplease sign up. The works are in French unless noted.
Trivia About The Archaeology o For now, I enjoyed reading the conclusion and bits throughout the construction of his argument – so, a positive rating.
Ia tanpa canggung sanggup menyenaraikan secara filosofis bagaimana kegilaan, misal, merupakan sumber dari terbangunnya suatu pereadaban. Not Foucault’s best work, though it is insightful when thinking foucaulg his other works.
Arkeologi Pengetahuan by Michel Foucault (3 star ratings)
My three stars has nothing to do with Micehl brilliant deconstruction of language, but rather the achievement of maximum verbosity. Do not ask who I am and do not ask me to remain the same: The links following respective editions point to their online versions; where no file format is specified abbreviations stand for digital archives. The Discourse was much better than Archaeology, which was a real slog. But incredibly well written.