Center for Middle Eastern Politics. Department of Political and Social Sciences. Freie Universität Berlin. Professor for Middle Eastern Politics. Address. Dr. Cilja Harders. Prof. Dr. Cilja Harders. Cilja Harders. Research Project B6. Principal Investigator. Address. Ihnestraße Room Berlin. Telephone. Freie Universität Berlin. Otto-Suhr-Institut für Politikwissenschaft. CRC ” Affective Societies”. Professor. Head of Project C Address. Otto-Suhr-Institut für.
|Published (Last):||17 May 2017|
|PDF File Size:||18.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.74 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In JulyProf. The speech was delivered at a celebration party with the editorial board, members of the advisory board, authors and friends of META.
Thank you for the invitation and the opportunity to be here with you and to celebrate 1 year and 2 issues of META. My initial focus will be cjlja my understanding of sense and nonsense, on the possibilities and limitations of regional research and its public and academic role. Against this background, I will reflect on our digital birthday boy—what does META want to accomplish cllja, and what should META accomplish, in today’s research environment?
Finally, I will look specifically harderw the newest issue and ask the question: Here, I can already reveal to you that the answer will be a resounding “Yes”.
With that, the birthday gifts may be unwrapped harderz the cake can be cut. What does META really mean? Fortunately, upon giving it a second and deeper thought, one must determine that the chosen name and the acronym of the journal have been perfectly selected.
Let me explain why. The use of the prefix META often implies a spatial or hardwrs superiority such as in metacommunication, metalanguage or meta-level. This is meant to apply to both empirical and theoretical questions.
The journal should appeal to young garders as well as the more established scholars, Arab as well as European or American readers— essentially, it seeks metacommunication in the best sense harder the word. In the term metamorphosis, lies a reference to transformation—an aspect, which seems to me, to be especially important for understanding regional research and which is reflected in the objectives of the editors.
It cioja about looking beyond exceptionalism and Orientalism, and instead looking toward that which is common, unifying and comparable, but doing so, without falling into the trap of globalist relativism.
The metaphor further reminds us that, because it springs from certain intellectual, social and economic contexts, knowledge is in need of careful translation. On these considerations, I would harvers like to focus. I must first however, ask you for a moment of forgiveness as I briefly indulge in a political science digression.
These described subject areas, theories and methods frame regional research as a question about economic, political, social, cultural, and religious developments as well as a question about historical roots in different regions. Narrowing focus solely to political, economic, or cultural factors seems, in the age of inter- and transnational interdependence, reductionist and inappropriate. This being said, where do the current challenges and contributions now lie?
I see them in alienation, translation, criticism, and positioning. The central contribution of regional research for the core disciplines and the wider public is, in the spirit of Said’s position, the capacity for astonishment and fundamental questioning of the normative and empirical as standard law. Current critical postcolonial theory deals with this as the needed provincialization of Europe—the centers.
These processes also destabilize, on a material level, securely-held power relations, without revolutionizing them completely. Theoretically, therefore, the question of translation and problem of “fit” are closely linked.
Firstly, this concerns the specific problem of intersubjective understanding of the stranger. But there is a second problem of “fit”. Under what conditions can, for example, political science properly describe, understand, and explain, when it believes itself to be a phenomenon.
And conversely, there is the problem that regional research must be able to communicate its findings inside the discipline. On the one hand, this is not evident, but it does highlight the necessity of meaningful engagement with the debates and concepts of each discipline. On the other hand, therein lies a compulsion to unify and to respect the great narratives of the subject such as: A good example of this is the discussion of statehood, which implicitly or explicitly, OECD law takes as a model and which can, in the light of these categories within the Arab world, only reveal deficient statehood.
This does not mean that there is no state failure or poor governance with SWANA, but this perspective obscures the political dynamics beyond the formal institutions. The theories must therefore travel, but in both directions! And this requires active translation work, which a journal like META can and should achieve.
Of course, an important shortcoming in the interpretation of Area Studies by the respective disciplines must not be concealed.
Speech by Cilja Harders about META
The knowledge we generate becomes “local” knowledge as it colja from the perception of the discipline. It can only receive the honor of being considered relevant knowledge, when it is communicated in the form of disciplinarily-relevant criteria. This also applies to regional studies: The areas are the foreign and the outside. Here, we clearly see that which Edward Said strongly reminded us of so long ago—namely that “the Orient” is an extremely lively and productive construct—a political invention of the “other”.
Reflecting on these historical contexts of knowledge production and the associated structures, exclusions and renewed power relationships hatders, for me, a core component of any critical regional research, which is also reflected in the self-expressed mission of our birthday girl.
Cilja Harders – IMDb
This is in no way trivial because a brief reference to the positionality of the speaker’s spokesperson is hardly enough. The terms and concepts, the empirical findings and their producers alike must give answers about the product of current conditions and what those realizations imply for the possibilities of knowledge.
A look at the past and present of our subject shows how intertwined politics and science are. And with that, it carries special responsibility for critical reflection, but also the responsibility to take a position, where perhaps advice accompanies concrete political action. Becker was convinced that the democratic elites of young democracies should be trained in political science.
Post-war political science joined in this democratic tradition by re-establishing itself as democracy science.
Cilja Harders: EuroMaidanTahrir
Historically, regional research on the Middle East has left a difficult legacy. The ethnographic, linguistic and political mapping of alien others served, as we have know since Foucault and Said, as containment and description, and as monitoring and control through description and categorization: With words as facts, the stranger becomes understandable and therefore controllable.
With Edward Said, it became clear that the Middle East had become a project area that the West required in order to rationally design itself as modern, advanced, cilua orderly.
Regional research not only describes but also creates knowledge. That knowledge is diverse, useful and instrumentalizing. This applies to enlightenment and anti-racism as well as warmongering, divisions, incitement and closures of horizons.
What does all this mean for the relationship between research and policy today: With the privilege of knowledge comes the obligation for communication and mediation. That says nothing of the chance to really be heard or even to generate a possible positive effect. You may have already sensed that in the context of such assessments I view projects like META and its goals positively.
Marburg University and the CNMS are ideal examples how the language, culture, history, economics and politics of a region can be thought about, taught and researched. The CNMS is perhaps currently the only place in Germany, where there is enough cipja and creative mass for such a task, and where the needed time, energy, money and stable organizational framework is available.
Uarders are no English and cilna interdisciplinary projects that would be in a better position to achieve the kind of translation work, which I have discussed thus far, from the provincialism of the discipline and the nation state.
META has set high standards and goals for itself, but a look at the two editions published thus far, proves that such aims can be achieved. Consistently stimulating, innovative and at the height of debate, META simultaneously sets the topics for current discussion. Quite intentionally, intellectuals were made the focus of the first edition. Here, the title says it all, as META seeks to stimulate intellectual debates. I believe the contributions of the journal should examine the excluded and subordinate and politics from below.
But what about the exclusions in the heart of the “self” such as poverty, injustice or political violence in the heart of Europe?
How is that connected with the phenomena that we study as regional researchers from a distance? I close with Schopenhauer, who once remarked that any stupid person can crush a beetle, but all the professors in the world cannot create one.
This I read as a call for modesty, something truly important to keep in mind. The same applies, as Said noted: META is calling for submissions for its 13th issue, which will be entitled Contacts. META is calling for Reviews more We log anonymous usage statistics. Please read the privacy information for details. Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer.
Let me briefly outline what I would like to speak to you about in the next 30 minutes. Alienation The central contribution of regional research for the core disciplines and the wider public is, in the spirit of Said’s position, the capacity for astonishment and fundamental questioning of the normative and empirical as standard law.
Translation Theoretically, therefore, the question of translation and problem of “fit” are closely linked. Critical self-reflection – what is the subject area? What does this mean for META? Said Translated from German. Usage Statistics and Privacy Information We log anonymous usage statistics.
Social Media Twitter Follow us on Twitter. Facebook Find us on Facebook.