Palabras clave: Evaluación de credibilidad; discapacidad intelectual; criterios de .. La prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio. la pericial psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio. En un estudio de archivo, . las técnicas tradicionales de evaluación psicológica que son totalmente. A.L. ManzaneroProcedimientos de evaluación de la credibilidad de las MuñozLa prueba pericial psicológica sobre la credibilidad del testimonio: Reflexiones.
|Published (Last):||27 February 2017|
|PDF File Size:||16.80 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.56 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Eyewitness testimony and time of day. The child sexual abuse accomodation syndrome. As subsequent research was expanding the list of differentiating attributes see Table 1the data was showing, simultaneously, that the presence of these distinctive features depends on the influence of a host of factors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36 1 Likewise, characteristics of the statements could vary in relation to the participant’s ability to generate a plausible statement.
On the other hand, the wide variability in memory origin means that the creddibilidad differentiating fantasies, lies, dreams, and post-event information are not the same. We want you to tell us even things that you might think are not very important.
Evaluación de la credibilidad de relatos de personas con discapacidad intelectual
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 18 7 Child abuse and Neglect, 14, Verschuere Ed Detecting Deception: All measurements, with the exception of lengthwere measured by counting the number of times each one occurred in the statements. Interview objectives and the evaluation of eyewitness performance. Psychology, 2 09 Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 57— Do perceptual and suggested accounts actually differ? Each of the persons with ID was given instructions and informed of the purpose of the research.
By the same token, prior to evaluating the testimony, the individual must be evaluated with regard to those abilities that could impact each of the credibility criteria used to distinguish between true and fabricated statements in this population.
Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches Expert Evidence, 7, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17 2 Law and Human Behavior, 20, Psychology, Crime and Law, 11 1 Memories of perceptive origin would have more contextual and sensory attributes and more semantic details, while self-generated memories would contain more information about cognitive operations.
Investigative interviews of children: The same instructions were given for all interviews conducted: Two “blind” researchers, experts at interviewing and taking testimony, interviewed each participant individually. In addition, the persons with ID who belonged to the false statement group were told explicitly that they had the option to lie and were assured there would be no negative consequences if they did so, thereby preventing undue tension.
The language of deceit: Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. Even for each modality, however, there are varying degrees of remove from the actual information.
Evaluacion Pericial by Pamela Alvarez on Prezi
American Journal of Psychotherapy, 55, Witness competency in people with mental retardation: The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: Let us remember that, in forensic psychology, the proposed maximum rate of error for a technique to be accepted as valid is 0. Research on persons with ID would have to be expanded to include other types of statements, such as those arising from false memories or those originating in the imagination.
When cluster A is considered equal to simulation and B equal to actual, the false statements were correctly classified in 16 cases Journal of Appplied Research in Intellectual disabilities, 16, Archives of Sexual Behavior.
Knowledge of crime context: Two evaluators trained in credibility analysis procedures using content criteria evaluated 13 true statements and 16 false statements. False abuse alegations by childrens and adolescents: Sexual abuse and exploitation of children and adults with mental retardation and other handicaps.
RecensiÃ³n. EvaluaciÃ³n Pericial PsicolÃ³gica de Credibilidad de Testimonio
Eyewitness testimony and perceived credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability. In addition, those participants who did not go on the dd trip were given a summary of the most important information about the trip, such as the location, the trip’s primary complication, and peficial the day went.
The psychology of criminal evidence. Thus, in a population of persons with severe ID or with a specific syndrome involving language disorders, perhaps the credibility criteria that prove to be significant for distinguishing between true and false statements would be different. For correcting amount of detaila chart was made of the micropropositions, describing as objectively as possible what happened in the actual event.
All persons with ID who participated in the study or their legal guardians signed a consent for voluntary participation. None of the phenomenological characteristics studied turned out to be significant for discriminating between actual and simulated victims. Journal of Psychology, What works in detecting high-stakes deception?
Perceived credibility and eyewitness testimony of children with intellectual disabilities. If the criteria that enable us to distinguish between true and false statements are the amount of detail and the length of the statement-the first also being especially important in evaluating a testimony as “true”-what happens with all those pscologica who have limited vocabulary, semantic and autobiographical memory deficits without which they cannot satisfactorily reproduce conversationsor difficulty situating events in a given context?
Effects of preparation on internal and external memories.
By the same token, many persons with ID also have great difficulty situating events in time and space Bailey et al.