LA Rivoluzione Dimenticata (Italian Edition) [Lucio Russo] on * FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Get Instant Access to La Rivoluzione Dimenticata. Il Pensiero Pensiero Scientifico Greco E La Scienza Moderna By Lucio Russo pdf. La Rivoluzione. Lucio Russo (born 22 November ) is an Italian physicist, mathematician and historian of Born in BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn (Italian: La rivoluzione dimenticata), Russo promotes the belief that Hellenistic science in the period.

Author: Neshura Dait
Country: Portugal
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 28 December 2009
Pages: 73
PDF File Size: 14.59 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.86 Mb
ISBN: 759-7-93281-674-5
Downloads: 58522
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Gubar

Some structure might, and therefore should, be discerned in it. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Lucio Russo born 22 November is an Italian physicistmathematician and historian of science. Perhaps, then, the scientific revolution consisted just in this: Briefly, I find his dismissal of non-Hellenistic science unmotivated.

This was not West- ern Europe of the 16th—17th centuries, but the eastern Lucoo of the third century B.

La Rivoluzione Dimenticata

In other projects Wikiquote. But what if the very same things change their meanings according to their contexts?

First, it belongs to a new wave of studies of Greek mathematics, where emphasis shifts from the Classical antecedents to the Hellenistic ex- tant sources themselves.

Lucio Russo in He ar- gues that all the components of this method were put in place in the Hellenistic world: For this dimenticaat in general, see [Saito ]. Nor later than the third century B.

Log In Rivo,uzione Up. Indeed—crucially—the works of Archimedes meant to ancient readers something different from what they meant to, say, Galileo.

Second, I think Russo puts too much stress on a single method. While something profound clearly changed roughly between the fifth and the fourth centuries B. We may often be wary today, as professional historians, of suggesting all-encompassing models of historical progress and decline.

La Rivoluzione Dimenticata by Lucio Russo

Hardly forgotten, readers might say. In- deed, it is not totally far-fetched to detect a hypothetico-deductive science in some works by Archimedes though even there I tend to see a more purely abstract mathematical thinkingBut taken in their historical context, such works belonged to a wider domain of persuasive dimentucata.


Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza moderna. If the book helps to renew interest in such grand narratives, it will have made a very interesting contribution. As this shift gets us from speculation into russi, it is of obvious methodological value. Click here to sign up.

University of Rome Tor Vergata. Essentially, this is a Popperian version of the hypothetico-deductive model, consisting of construct- ing theoretical domains, producing conclusions according to mathematical reasoning, and interpreting and testing those conclusions by appealing to empirical realizations.

Indeed, Russo cannot be much wrong in ascribing rivouzione major role, in this play, to the Greeks. A truly forgotten revolution! The community of historians of math- ematics should be grateful for Russo for this achievement, and should hope that the book gets quickly translated into other major languages. We should try to explain how this has happened and, thanks to Russo, the problem may now be addressed. In The Forgotten Revolution: This page rivoluzioe last edited on 5 Septemberat He engaged in mass purges and expulsions of all intellectuals.

Second, Russo is right, I think, to highlight a problem that was largely overlooked by the scholarship—that is, how exactly lufio Greek science get forgotten?

Mathematical reconstructions out, textual studies in: He also concludes that the 17th-century scientific revolution in Europe was due in large part to the recovery of Hellenistic science. Archimedes was not, and his works meant, to ancient readers, something different from what they would mean if written today.

La rivoluzione dimenticata. Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza moderna

Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. When we give an etymology for a word we hardly ever explain its real meaning, past or present, as such rivoluzioe depend on a synchronic network of connotations. Zur Geschichte epistemischer Dinge. Third and finally, whatever we may think of the narrative Russo offers for the entire his- tory of Western science, I feel we ought to applaud him for offering it. Skip to main content. We simply cannot date much ancient science with any accuracy.


Somehow, a process of forgetting must have occurred in rivoluzionee. Among his main areas of interest are Gibbs measure of the Ising modelpercolation theory[1] and finite Bernoulli schemes, within which he proved an approximate version of the classical Kolmogorov’s zero—one law. First, I think Russo puts too much stress on a single period. In L’ America dimenticataRusso suggests that the Americas were known to some European civilizations in ancient times, probably discovered by the Phoenicians or the Carthaginiansbut that the knowledge was lost under Roman expansion in the 2nd century BCE.

This did not have empirical realizations, and it merely anticipated the achievements of the Hellenistic world in math- ematical reasoning. Help Center Find new research papers in: Hellenistic science was focused on the city of Alexandria. In the history of science, he has reconstructed some contributions of the Hellenistic astronomer Hipparchusthrough the analysis of his surviving works, and the proof of heliocentrism attributed by Plutarch to Seleucus of Seleucia and studied the history of theories of tides [3]from the Hellenistic to modern age.

Wikiquote has quotations related to: The same principle holds for intellectual achievements, yet Russo to exaggerate a little reads Archimedes almost as if he was the contemporary of Popper. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

It will serve as excellent reading in a survey of the history of science, besides of course offering an important thesis, well worth our critical attention.