The Grand Jury Presentment related the testimony of a graduate The graduate assistant, who was familiar with Sandusky, was going to put. Jerry Sandusky has been arraigned on 40 counts of sex crimes related to boys, and was released on $ unsecured bail. The presentment of a grand jury investigating Jerry Sandusky follows. Warning: This presentment includes explicit descriptions of the.
|Published (Last):||14 February 2013|
|PDF File Size:||5.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.57 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That is an interesting sound-bite for sure, but in terms of Pennsylvania law, it is perhaps even worse. You never used profane or vulgar language. The question at this point is, how did the grand jury come to approve this presentment?
Here is the complete Grand Jury Presentment of their case against Sandusky. For Josh McDaniels, that’s a dream scenario that may come true. Here are the relevant timeline events from the Moulton report:.
Read The Grand Jury Presentment Against Sandusky
It is important to note that the grand jurors do not prepare the presentment. Granf log in using one of these methods to post your comment: The clear implication made by the presentment is that an anal rape was reported to Paterno.
Unusual, even outlandish, flavor combinations. I did not see actual insertion.
Read The Grand Jury Presentment Against Sandusky « CBS Boston
He saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he estimated to be ten years old, with his hands up against the wall, being subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky. The clear implication made by the presentment that an anal rape was reported to Paterno had far ranging consequences when the scandal broke in early November Notify me of new comments via email. The grand jurors do not author the grand jury presentment. It is not public whether full or partial testimony was read into the record to the voting grand jury.
Paterno, Curley, and Schultz testify. Notify me of new posts via email. When Trooper Ellis followed up with you, you said that the meeting with Joe Paterno only lasted about five minutes.
In Pennsylvania, once charges are bound for trial after a preliminary hearing which has a relatively low bar to meetcase law indicates that any issues or challenges to a grand jury presentment are rendered moot and no longer matter. Coach Paterno, according to his own testimony, definitely knew it was severely sexual. The presentment is submitted to the grand jurors.
I do remember seeing that.
At trial, defense attorney Karl Rominger asked McQueary about his statement to police and his testimony to the grand jury, at page By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. The prosecutors had their testimony read into the record for the voting grand jury.
The graduate assistant was shocked but noticed that both Victim 2 and Sandusky saw him. He believed the sounds to be those of sexual activity. The author of jkry presentment took two different statements, separated them from their context, and relayed them in the presentment to convey an idea that McQueary never rgand to — namely that he told Paterno he witnessed anal rape.
Judge Feudale writes the following in footnote However, based on the fact that all of the charges have been held for court after preliminary hearings, any such argument is moot. Here are the relevant timeline events from the Moulton report: To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: McQueary testified to the grand jury about what he told Paterno.
As he was quick to recall on becoming the new Chief Judge of New York and its Court of Appeals, Sol Wachtler has long favored eliminating grand juries from most felony cases.
Read the Grand Jury presentment
The graduate assistant went to his office and called his father, reporting to him what he had seen. Here are the top rated spots in Boston.
McQueary says this is semantics, which is correct in terms of conveying that there was a serious issue. As the graduate assistant put the sneakers in his locker, he looked into the shower. The graduate assistant left immediately, distraught.
Again, the voting grand jury never heard McQueary, Curley, or Schultz testify and yet the voting grand jury approved a presentment that commented on their credibility. This particular ruling was in response to motion from Curley and Schultz to quash the grand jury presentment. McQueary provided a written statement to police one day later.
Yes, I — Q: And at page Paterno Made The Preswntment Choice. Does this slow start to the season mean anything for the rest of winter ahead? He then heard rhythmic, slapping sounds.